NBA Finals: How Celtics’ Defense Shut Down The Mavs

Introduction

The Boston Celtics set the tone in Game 1 of the NBA Finals with a stifling defensive performance against the Dallas Mavericks. Despite Kristaps Porzingis’ strong return from a 38-day absence, the Celtics held the Mavericks to just 89 points on 94 possessions. This article dives deep into how Boston’s one-on-one defense and strategic adjustments slowed down the Mavericks’ offense. (IPL BETTING)

IPL betting online in India is a fair opportunity to earn money while supporting your favourite team and players.
IPL betting online in India is a fair opportunity to earn money while supporting your favourite team and players.

Key Highlights

Kristaps Porzingis’ Return

Porzingis shot 8-for-13 in his comeback game, showcasing his offensive prowess. However, his performance was overshadowed by the Celtics’ defensive dominance.

Luka Doncic’s Struggles

Luka Doncic scored 30 points but on 12-for-26 shooting. His efficiency dipped, and he managed only one assist, tying the lowest of his career in games with at least 15 minutes of play.

Boston’s Defensive Strategy

The Celtics maintained their defensive discipline, avoiding unnecessary double-teams and focusing on one-on-one matchups. This approach kept Dallas’ shooters, particularly those in the corners, from finding open looks.

Detailed Analysis

1. Defending One-on-One

Number to Know: The Mavericks were 1-for-3 on corner 3-pointers, a significant drop from their playoff-high average of 4.6 corner 3s per game.

On the Mavericks’ first possession, the Celtics double-teamed Daniel Gafford in the post against Jayson Tatum. However, they chose not to double Doncic against Jaylen Brown, preferring to stay home on shooters.

2. Switch and Be Ready to Help

Number to Know: Doncic had 22 drives in Game 1, but the Mavericks scored just 0.85 points per chance, down from 1.12 points per chance in previous rounds.

Al Horford was the primary defender in pick-and-roll situations against Doncic, switching on most occasions. Despite being beaten off the dribble a couple of times, Horford held Doncic and Irving to 3-for-13 shooting combined.

3. Keeping Porzingis Out of the Action

Number to Know: Porzingis defended 19.3 ball screens per 36 minutes, more than any other Celtic.

While Horford switched on screens, Porzingis generally played drop coverage, staying back to protect the rim. This strategy proved effective early on but required adjustments as the game progressed.

Film Study

Luka Doncic Back Down vs. Jaylen Brown

On their second possession, the Mavericks avoided double-teaming Doncic against Brown. This allowed Boston to keep other defenders close to their assignments, limiting Dallas’ open looks.

Derrick White’s Help Defense

Early in the second quarter, White’s timely help on a Doncic drive forced a tough shot, exemplifying the Celtics’ defensive communication and trust.

Pre-Switching Strategies

Later in the game, Porzingis and the Celtics executed pre-switches to avoid mismatches. This tactic disrupted Dallas’ pick-and-roll actions and forced turnovers.

Game 2 Adjustments

The Mavericks will likely focus on:

  • Aggressive Drives: Doncic needs to be more forceful on his drives to draw help defenders and create open shots for teammates.
  • Quicker Decisions: Off-ball players must attack close-outs faster to exploit Boston’s rotations.
  • Maximizing Irving’s Impact: A hot shooting night from Kyrie Irving could change the dynamics, making Boston’s defense less effective.

FAQs

1. How did the Celtics limit Doncic’s assists?

The Celtics stayed home on shooters and avoided unnecessary double-teams, forcing Doncic to take difficult shots.

2. What was Porzingis’ role in the Mavericks’ offense?

Porzingis provided a scoring punch, but his defensive role in drop coverage was crucial in protecting the rim.

3. How did Boston’s switching defense impact the game?

Switching allowed the Celtics to keep defenders in front of their assignments, limiting easy baskets and open shots.

4. What adjustments can the Mavericks make for Game 2?

Dallas needs to be more aggressive on drives and quicker in their decision-making to exploit Boston’s rotations.

5. Can the Mavericks improve their three-point shooting?

Focusing on creating open looks through better ball movement and player spacing can help improve their three-point efficiency.

Conclusion

The Boston Celtics’ defensive strategy in Game 1 was a masterclass in one-on-one defense and tactical adjustments. By limiting Dallas’ open looks and forcing tough shots, they set a blueprint for success in the NBA Finals. As the series progresses, both teams will make adjustments, but the Celtics have established themselves as a formidable defensive unit.

Stay tuned for more in-depth analysis of the NBA Finals. For the latest updates and expert insights, visit Create More Customers Agency. (IPL BETTING)